Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781603›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Regulatory approval, reimbursement and postmarketing evidence of class 1 novel drugs in China, 2018-2023: an observational study.

Xin Gao, Rui Li, Feng Xie, Monica Yu, Yao-Ling Wang, Xiao-Lu Zhang, Pei-Meng Wang, Fei-Yi Xiao, Yi-Sha Lin, Xue-Fei Gu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xin GaoChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Rui LiChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Feng XieDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Monica YuImperial College London, London, UK.
Yao-Ling WangChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Lu ZhangChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Pei-Meng WangChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Fei-Yi XiaoChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Yi-Sha LinChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Xue-Fei GuChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Kun ZhaoChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Yu-Zheng ZhangChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Thomas ButtUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0387-4550
Liang YaoNanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Xue LiChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-8442
Wu-Dong GuoChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4256-7228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The global pharmaceutical industry is undergoing profound changes, with countries worldwide actively investing in innovation ecosystems. In China, innovation has been incentivised through policies aimed at regulatory modernisation, value-based reimbursement and health system integration. In particular, expedited regulatory pathways and inclusion of innovative drugs into the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) through value-based pricing were key approaches adopted by Chinese health authorities. To describe developments under these policies, we map the regulatory approval, reimbursement and postmarketing evidence of class 1 novel drugs across three critical phases: regulatory pathways, value-based reimbursement price negotiation and real-world clinical evidence generation. Methods: A mixed-methods approach comprising a cross-sectional study and a literature review was used to aggregate the evidence. We first identified the innovative drugs classified as 'class 1 novel drugs' by the National Medical Products Administration from 2018 to 2023. Second, we collected and analysed evidence of class 1 novel drugs, including timelines of market access and NRDL inclusion, price reduction before and after reimbursement and clinical evidence updates from market access to postmarketing. Results: 95 class 1 novel drugs were identified as being included in the NRDL, with the median regulatory-to-reimbursement interval shortened by more than 50%, from a median of 15 to 7 months. The median price reduction after the value-based pricing was 63%. Furthermore, compared with included drugs' real-world studies (RWS), clinical trials remained the backbone of evidentiary standards for regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions as they demonstrated superior methodological robustness compared with RWS, which often had limitations related to small sample sizes and inconsistent endpoint definitions. Conclusions: By linking regulatory approval, reimbursement and postmarketing evidence for China's class 1 novel drugs, this study provides an integrated evidence base to inform policy discussions on balancing innovation incentives, affordability and evidence generation.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudieseconomicsPublic HealthSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID42781603
PMCPMC13599998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.