ArticleBMJ public health2026
Regulatory approval, reimbursement and postmarketing evidence of class 1 novel drugs in China, 2018-2023: an observational study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The global pharmaceutical industry is undergoing profound changes, with countries worldwide actively investing in innovation ecosystems. In China, innovation has been incentivised through policies aimed at regulatory modernisation, value-based reimbursement and health system integration. In particular, expedited regulatory pathways and inclusion of innovative drugs into the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) through value-based pricing were key approaches adopted by Chinese health authorities. To describe developments under these policies, we map the regulatory approval, reimbursement and postmarketing evidence of class 1 novel drugs across three critical phases: regulatory pathways, value-based reimbursement price negotiation and real-world clinical evidence generation. Methods: A mixed-methods approach comprising a cross-sectional study and a literature review was used to aggregate the evidence. We first identified the innovative drugs classified as 'class 1 novel drugs' by the National Medical Products Administration from 2018 to 2023. Second, we collected and analysed evidence of class 1 novel drugs, including timelines of market access and NRDL inclusion, price reduction before and after reimbursement and clinical evidence updates from market access to postmarketing. Results: 95 class 1 novel drugs were identified as being included in the NRDL, with the median regulatory-to-reimbursement interval shortened by more than 50%, from a median of 15 to 7 months. The median price reduction after the value-based pricing was 63%. Furthermore, compared with included drugs' real-world studies (RWS), clinical trials remained the backbone of evidentiary standards for regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions as they demonstrated superior methodological robustness compared with RWS, which often had limitations related to small sample sizes and inconsistent endpoint definitions. Conclusions: By linking regulatory approval, reimbursement and postmarketing evidence for China's class 1 novel drugs, this study provides an integrated evidence base to inform policy discussions on balancing innovation incentives, affordability and evidence generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.