ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Regulatory evolution and service delivery models of telepharmacy in Thailand: a review of pandemic responses and future policy directions.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital health adoption in Thailand, disrupting traditional healthcare delivery and prompting rapid pharmaceutical system reforms. Prior to 2020, telepharmacy was virtually non-existent due to strict regulations mandating in-person dispensing at licensed premises; however, the public health crisis prompted policy changes, leading to regulatory relaxation and the formal establishment of telepharmacy standards. To understand these transformative shifts, this review examines the regulatory evolution of telepharmacy in Thailand, classifies diverse service delivery models implemented across hospital and community pharmacy settings, and synthesises effectiveness evidence to inform future pharmaceutical policy and sustainable system integration. Methods: An integrative narrative review using documentary analysis of official policy and regulatory documents was conducted. Studies evaluating telepharmacy or medication delivery services were identified through PRISMA-guided searches of Thai-Journal Citation Index (TCI), PubMed, and Google Scholar (2020-2025). Results: Thailand implemented a phased policy response progressing from emergency regulatory flexibility toward institutionalised governance. Seven hospital-based telepharmacy models were identified. Synthesis of 31 included studies (14 pharmacist-led and 17 telemedicine with medication delivery or medication delivery without pharmacist counselling studies) suggested that telepharmacy and medication delivery services generally supported continuity of care for chronic diseases. Studies involving pharmacist interventions more frequently reported favourable outcomes, although findings varied across service models. Implementation relied largely on social media platforms and proprietary applications, though independent pharmacies faced financial barriers to accessing certified platforms. Conclusion: While telepharmacy has been integrated into routine care under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS), an institutionalisation gap remains regarding sustainable public financing and digital infrastructure. Addressing regulatory clarity, reimbursement mechanisms, digital equity, and platform interoperability will be essential for the long-term and equitable integration of telepharmacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.