Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781585›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

Orchard management alters citrus root and rhizosphere microbiomes with functional consequences for plant performance.

Nichole Ginnan, Riley Jones, Jessica Wu-Woods, Tariq Pervaiz, Ashraf El-Kereamy, Vanessa E T M Ashworth, Muhammad Imran Hamid, Emma K Dawson, Sarah L Strauss, Jason Stajich and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nichole GinnanDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3589-4767
Riley JonesDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Jessica Wu-WoodsDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Tariq PervaizDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Ashraf El-KereamyDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Vanessa E T M AshworthDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Muhammad Imran HamidDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Emma K DawsonDepartment of Soil, Water, and Ecosystems Sciences, Southwest Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Immokalee, FL 34142, United States.
Sarah L StraussDepartment of Soil, Water, and Ecosystems Sciences, Southwest Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Immokalee, FL 34142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-5320
Jason StajichDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-0020
Philippe RolshausenDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-680X
Caroline RoperDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4637-6225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural management practices act as ecological disturbances that can restructure soil and plant-associated microbial communities, but the functional consequences of these microbial shifts on crop performance remain poorly understood. Here, we examined how common orchard inputs, including wood mulch, glyphosate, and humic acid, affect citrus root and rhizosphere microbiomes, leaf nutrient trajectories, and tree performance over a 3-year field experiment. Mulch emerged as the dominant driver of fungal community composition and taxonomic turnover, enriching for saprophytic fungi. Conversely, bacterial communities responded primarily to interactions among applications, particularly mulch × glyphosate, which was associated with significant depletions of bacterial genera in roots and rhizospheres. These microbiome changes corresponded with reduced tree carbon assimilation, transpiration, and yield, and altered leaf nutrients dynamics. To verify whether the microbial shifts were contributing to these plant phenotypic changes, we conducted a greenhouse experiment using field-derived soil microbiota. Active microbiota from mulch-treated soils reduced citrus seedling establishment and root growth relative to microbiota from nonmulched soils, whereas heat-killed controls eliminated these negative effects, demonstrating a causal relationship between management-induced microbiota changes and decreases in plant performance. The effect of mulch-associated microbiota on root growth further depended on glyphosate history, paralleling field observations. Humic acid increased root growth regardless of microbiota activity and moderated decreases in shoot growth by mulch-associated microbiota. Together, these results show that management practices can restructure citrus microbiomes and generate community-level traits that influence plant performance, highlighting the importance of incorporating microbial ecology and microbiome information when devising crop management strategies.

Indexed as

agricultural managementcitrus microbiomedisturbance ecologylegacy effectsmicrobiome functionplant–microbe interactionsplant microbiomerhizosphere microbiomesoil microbiology

Identifiers

PMID42781585
PMCPMC13600423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.