Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781527›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine

Millennium Cohort Study: cohort profile and data resource update.

Aase Villadsen, Emla Fitzsimons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aase VilladsenUCL Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0066-9188
Emla FitzsimonsUCL Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cohort profile gives a comprehensive overview of the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), a nationally representative study of children born in the UK during 2000-02. The study is for researchers in public health and other disciplines who seek a comprehensive overview of the MCS and its data resources. This profile describes the study design, sampling strategy, population characteristics, breadth of measures collected, the availability of biological samples and linked administrative data, approaches to missing data and attrition, and key resources for navigating and accessing the datasets. Earlier cohort profiles are also updated here, and the full range of data resources currently available (through to the most recent survey of participant at age 23 years) is documented.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID42781527
PMCPMC13599884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.