ArticleiScience2026
Predicting disease progression and mortality in prostate cancer using real-world data-driven time-inhomogeneous Markov models.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer progression varies across patients. Understanding disease trajectories and mortality risk is important for improved healthcare. This study developed a time-inhomogeneous Markov model using territory-wide electronic medical records from Hong Kong to estimate 10-year disease progression. The model was constructed using data from 3,274 patients newly diagnosed in 2010-2012. Their electronic medical records defined baseline covariates (age, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) and time-varying health states. Mild cases (age≤65, CCI = 0, PSA≤4 ng/mL) were predicted to have 16.9% and 28.0% mortality at five and ten years. Evaluated on an independent 2013 cohort, our model showed strong prediction performance for metastasis-free survival (concordance index [C-index]: 0.780; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.723-0.837) and overall survival (C-index: 0.787; 95% CI: 0.731-0.843), exceeding Cox proportional hazards and random survival forest models. This study provides a pragmatic tool for long-term progression risk prediction and health economic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.