ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
A multi-step screening algorithm for fecal microbiota transplantation donors: integrating metagenomic and metabolomic profiling for improved safety and donor quality assessment.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a highly effective treatment for recurrent Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study we evaluated 178 stool donor candidates using a novel screening algorithm, which combined extended medical history, blood and urine testing, stool metagenomics (16S rRNA gene sequencing) and metabolomics (short-chain fatty acids), and microbiological stool tests to exclude the stool samples with pathogens and ensure their microbial diversity. Results: The FMT donor screening and selection workflow was developed and included four main steps: 1. Potential donors ( Conclusions: This study establishes a data-driven, high-stringency donor selection framework that provides a rational basis for improving FMT safety and donor quality. Our findings advocate for the standardized implementation of advanced screening technologies, particularly SCFA metabolomics, as a critical quality control step in stool banking. While clinical validation of the efficacy-enhancing potential of this protocol requires prospective studies, the strong association between butyrate-producing microbiota and favorable FMT outcomes, combined with our previous clinical observations, supports the utility of our approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.