ArticleBrain communications2026
Cerebral autoregulation in the hyperacute phase after experimental subarachnoid haemorrhage using an endovascular perforation model.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impaired cerebral blood flow contributes to delayed neurological deficits after subarachnoid haemorrhage, but cerebral autoregulation, which regulates cerebral blood flow to the brain in the hyperacute phase is poorly defined. We characterized early pressure- and flow-based reactivity in a rat subarachnoid haemorrhage perforation model. This is a retrospective analysis of older data acquired to investigate a different hypothesis. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent endovascular perforation subarachnoid haemorrhage. Arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure and bilateral laser Doppler flow were continuously recorded. Pressure reactivity (PRx*) and flow reactivity (LDx*) were calculated as 5-min moving Pearson correlations between arterial and intracranial pressure and arterial pressure and laser Doppler flowmetry, respectively. Exposure above impairment thresholds (PRx* > 0.3; LDx* > 0.5) was compared pre-subarachnoid haemorrahge (-30-0 min) versus post-subarachnoid haemorrhage (15-60 min) and related to haemorrhage severity. Group-mean PRx* and LDx* remained below impairment thresholds. Nevertheless, time with PRx* > 0.3 increased after subarachnoid haemorrhage (median 0.0% versus 1.9%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.