Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781428›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Recurrent Post-traumatic Frontal Mucocele Following Previous Endoscopic Management: Alternative Surgical Reconstruction With Partial Capsule Resection.

Ludmila Rodrigues Ribeiro da Silva

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ludmila Rodrigues Ribeiro da SilvaBurn Reconstructive Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Galveston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frontal sinus mucoceles are benign but locally aggressive expansile lesions that may occur years after trauma or previous sinus surgery. Their progressive enlargement can lead to bone remodeling, facial deformity, orbital involvement, and intracranial complications. Endoscopic marsupialization is currently considered the standard treatment in most cases; however, recurrence remains possible, particularly in patients with altered anatomy secondary to trauma or previous surgical manipulation. This report describes the case of a 55-year-old man with a history of severe frontal trauma after a motor vehicle accident resulting in loss of the anterior table of the frontal sinus. The patient subsequently developed a frontal mucocele that had previously been treated elsewhere with endoscopic frontal sinus drainage and osteoma shaving. Despite initial management, recurrence occurred slightly more than one year later, with progressive frontal deformity and patient dissatisfaction. An alternative surgical strategy was therefore proposed consisting of complete frontal sinus drainage, partial capsule resection, excision of redundant frontal skin after decompression, and reduction with closure of the residual capsule. Histopathological analysis of the capsule and drained material demonstrated no evidence of neoplasia. The patient evolved with satisfactory aesthetic contour, good scar healing, and no recurrence after one year of follow-up. This case highlights an alternative surgical option for selected patients with recurrent post-traumatic frontal mucoceles and anatomically distorted frontal sinuses following previous endoscopic management.

Indexed as

capsule resectioncase reportfrontal sinus mucocelefrontal sinus surgeryfrontal sinus traumamucocele excisionpost-traumatic mucocelerecurrent mucocele

Identifiers

PMID42781428
PMCPMC13599377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.