ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Additive protection of transcranial direct current stimulation and mitochondrial transplantation on ischemic stroke via inducing A2 astrocytes.
Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Therapeutic options for the acute phase of ischemic stroke remain limited. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mitochondrial transplantation have emerged as promising neuroprotective approaches, but their individual efficacy is variable. We hypothesized that combining these two therapies would produce additive benefits for post-stroke recovery. Methods: Focal cortical ischemia was induced in mice using photothrombotic technique. Mice were randomly assigned to receive sham treatment, tDCS, mitochondrial transplantation, or combined treatment. Grid-walking, cylinder tests and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining were used to assess motor recovery and infarct volume, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining, and western blotting were performed to determine mitochondrial internalization and polarization of astrocytes Results: Combining tDCS with mitochondrial transplantation resulted in a significantly greater reduction in infarct volume and improvement in locomotor function compared to either treatment alone. Interestingly, tDCS specifically enhanced the uptake of exogenous mitochondria by astrocytes. This was associated with a significant increase in beneficial A2 astrocytes and decrease in detrimental A1 astrocytes. Mechanistically, the combined treatment led to a marked upregulation of CD38 in astrocytes, suggesting their involvement in the tDCS-facilitated mitochondrial endocytosis. Suppression of CD38 expression by short interfering RNA attenuated astrocyte mitochondrial endocytosis and A2 phenotype induced by tDCS. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that combining tDCS with mitochondrial transplantation conferred superior neuroprotection against ischemic brain damage than either treatment alone, and may represent a promising strategy for ischemic stroke treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.