ArticleHealth science reports2026
Topological Organization of Center-of-Pressure Dynamics During Virtual Reality Walking Differs Between Individuals With Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Older Adults.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gait impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD) is multifactorial and may become more pronounced under perceptual-cognitive challenge. Virtual reality (VR) provides an altered locomotor context, yet its effects on both conventional magnitude-based Center of pressure (CoP) metrics and higher-order structural organization remain unclear. This study compared linear, nonlinear, and topological characteristics of stance-phase CoP trajectories between individuals with PD and healthy older adults during normal and VR walking, with particular emphasis on whether VR elicited group-specific differences in topological organization. Methods: Fifteen individuals with idiopathic PD and 17 age-matched controls performed overground walking under normal gait (NG) and VR conditions. Stance-phase CoP trajectories were analyzed using linear magnitude measures (path length, velocity, root mean square, ellipse area), sample entropy (SampEn), and persistent homology-derived persistence entropy (H0 and H1). Mixed-factor repeated-measures ANOVA models assessed Group and Task effects. Results: VR increased CoP path length ( Conclusions: The primary analysis showed a group-dependent H1 persistence-entropy response across normal and VR walking. However, because zero entropy represented both zero- and one-feature diagrams and robustness across alternative point-cloud densities and persistence thresholds was not examined, this finding should be considered exploratory. Conventional CoP measures did not show diagnosis-specific responses to VR. H1 persistence entropy may therefore provide complementary information about CoP trajectory organization, although its physiological and clinical significance requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.