ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Effect of improved uterotonic availability on postpartum hemorrhage and maternal morbidity after vaginal delivery, review of a single-center quality-improvement initiative.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: After implementation of a hemorrhage risk stratification system and management bundle in 2019, our hospital demonstrated a reduction in hemorrhage-related severe maternal morbidity (SMM-H). We then noted a plateau in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) rates and a gradual increase in SMM-H after 2020, with the majority of PPH after vaginal deliveries (VDs) occurring in those deemed low-risk. Consequently, we implemented a strategy to improve the availability of second-line uterotonics in the delivery room regardless of PPH risk. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of this intervention on rates of PPH and SMM-H after VDs. Methods: Through this quality improvement (QI) initiative, we aimed to improve injectable uterotonic availability and use at time of delivery. Our primary outcome measures were rate of PPH and SMM-H in VD. We reviewed all deliveries from the 16 months before and after this intervention (April 2023-July 2024, September 2024-December 2025). Deliveries from August 2024 were excluded to allow for washout. Chi-square was used to determine statistical significance. Results: There were 5365 VDs included in the pre-intervention group with 63.6% designated low-risk for PPH and 4768 included in the post-intervention group with 62.4% designated low-risk. There was no difference in VD PPH pre- versus post-intervention (6.33% vs. 6.61%, Conclusion: Improving second-line uterotonic availability in the delivery room did not improve VD PPH rates or SMM-H but did change second-line uterotonic choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.