Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781333›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2026

Proximity Labeling in

Aelon Rahmani, Yee Lian Chew

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aelon RahmaniFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Yee Lian ChewFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory is a fundamental process, regulated by protein-protein interactions within neuronal proteome networks. Learning-dependent changes in specific brain regions important for memory have been detected by mass spectrometry, by comparing proteins from animals trained to learn with mock-trained controls. Detection through this method relies on relative protein abundance; brain dissection is readily available for macroscopic animals to spatially control protein identification by mass spectrometry. In the nematode

Indexed as

C. elegansLearningMemoryNeuroscienceProtein proximity labelingTurboID

Identifiers

PMID42781333
PMCPMC13598659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.