ArticleJournal of cardiovascular echography
Electrocardiographic Identification and Correction of Left Ventricular Pacing Latency.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular echography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pacing latency, defined as the delay between a pacemaker stimulus and myocardial depolarization, is an uncommon but clinically relevant phenomenon in patients with permanent pacing systems. Its presence may be mistaken for a lead malfunction, exit block, or device failure, leading to unnecessary interventions. A 55-year-old male with a history of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction-30% on standard two-dimensional echocardiography; 17% on speckle-tracking assessment) and severe systolic dysfunction, previously implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D), was admitted with progressive abdominal distension, bilateral lower limb edema, and weight gain of 5-6 kg over 2 weeks. Examination revealed hypotension (90/60 mmHg), elevated jugular venous pressure, pedal edema, and basal crepitations. Laboratory evaluation showed elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (4750 pg/mL). He was treated with intravenous diuretics and guideline-directed medical therapy, resulting in clinical improvement and weight reduction from 75 to 70 kg. During hospitalization, device interrogation confirmed stable parameters. However, a 12-lead electrocardiography demonstrated consistent pacing latency with an 80 ms delay between the pacing spike and QRS onset. Electrolytes were normal, and no offending medications were identified. The patient was discharged in New York Heart Association Functional Class II after symptomatic improvement. This case highlights the mechanical and electrophysiological consequences of LV pacing latency in a patient with CRT-D and worsening heart failure. Pacing latency required active correction to restore effective biventricular resynchronization. Recognition of this entity is essential to guide targeted device optimization and prevent unnecessary interventions. Advanced echocardiographic techniques play a critical complementary role in assessing the mechanical impact of pacing latency and the efficacy of its correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.