Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781208›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

A Scoping Review of Risk Factors for Thunderstorm Asthma in Pediatric Patients.

Suraya Foster, Nora Antova, Adam Usher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suraya FosterRespiratory Medicine, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, GBR.
Nora AntovaRespiratory Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, ITA.
Adam UsherRespiratory Medicine, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thunderstorm weather conditions are known to trigger asthma-like symptoms in susceptible patients, causing spikes in the use of paramedical, primary care, and hospital services. While risk factors for thunderstorm asthma (TSA) in adults have been studied in both original research and systematic reviews, there has been less focus on the risk profile of pediatric patients. With epidemic TSA (ETSA) events predicted to increase in frequency and severity as climate change progresses, it is more crucial than ever to identify those children most at risk so that appropriate public health education, parent and family education, and conservative management can be initiated. This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR checklist. We searched Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus for primary research that assessed risk factors or strong predictive associations for TSA in patient cohorts that included children. A total of 39 studies met our inclusion criteria; of these, just five focused exclusively on pediatric populations. We found that ETSA events may trigger a first-time asthma presentation in a large proportion of pediatric patients, especially those with atopic conditions such as allergic rhinitis or eczema. In some studies that included both children and adults, younger age groups were among those most affected by TSA; however, analysis was not routinely age-stratified. These findings highlight a critical gap in the literature, limiting the ability to define a pediatric-specific risk profile. Further research is needed to inform targeted prevention strategies, clinical management, and public health preparedness.

Indexed as

climate changepediatricspublic healthrisk factorsthunderstorm asthma

Identifiers

PMID42781208
PMCPMC13600730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.