ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2026
Correlation analysis of the expression levels of serum endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and sirtuin 1 protein in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the relationships among the expression levels of serum silencing information regulator 2-related enzyme 1 (SIRT1), endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 (ESM-1), and fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21) and treatment results in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with sepsis. Methods: A total of 140 patients with sepsis-related ARDS were selected and divided into a good-outcome group (96 patients) and a poor-outcome group (44 patients) based on treatment outcome. The levels of serum SIRT1, ESM-1, and FGF21 were compared between the two groups; the correlations between serum SIRT1, ESM-1, and FGF21 and disease severity and treatment outcome were analysed; and the predictive value of serum SIRT1, ESM-1, and FGF21 for treatment outcomes was evaluated. Results: Compared with those in the group with favourable outcomes, the serum SIRT1 level was lower, while the ESM-1 and FGF21 levels were significantly higher in the poor outcome group than in the good outcome group (P<0.05). Serum SIRT1 levels decreased steadily in patients with mild, moderate, and severe illness, whereas ESM-1 and FGF21 levels increased consistently (P<0.05). ESM-1 and FGF21 showed a positive association with illness severity (P<0.05), whereas serum SIRT1 was negatively correlated (P<0.05) with disease severity according to Spearman correlation analysis. Partial correlation analysis indicated that serum SIRT1, ESM-1, and FGF21 levels were significantly related to treatment outcomes in patients with sepsis-related ARDS (P<0.05). The levels of serum SIRT1, ESM-1, and FGF21 and treatment outcomes were strongly linked (P<0.05) in patients with sepsis-related ARDS. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting treatment course in patients with ARDS associated with sepsis were 0.742 for SIRT1, 0.838 for ESM-1, and 0.796 for FGF21. The sensitivities were 77.27% and 70.45%, and the specificities were 64.58%, 81.25%, and 87.50%, respectively. For patients with sepsis-related ARDS, the combined AUC of the three markers for treatment outcome was 0.939, with a sensitivity of 88.64% and a specificity of 83.33%, significantly surpassing the individual predictive values of the three markers alone (P<0.05). Conclusions: The levels of serum SIRT1, ESM-1, and FGF21 in patients with sepsis-related ARDS are strongly associated with both treatment efficacy and illness severity, can independently predict treatment outcomes, and have greater combined predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.