Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781150›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2026

Impacts on water quality before and after water line cleaning and disinfection with peracetic acid in swine farms.

Gabrielle E Doughan, Becca K Walthart, Meredith B Petersen, Cora E Schau, Kristin J Skoland, Justin T Brown, Scott L Radke, Jessica L Bonnema, Danyang Zhang, Chong Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gabrielle E DoughanDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1197-4758
Becca K WalthartDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Meredith B PetersenDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Cora E SchauDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Kristin J SkolandDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Justin T BrownDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Scott L RadkeDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Jessica L BonnemaDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Danyang ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Chong WangDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States.
Locke A KarrikerDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Swine Medicine Education Center, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is well recognized that maintaining good water quality is a cornerstone of swine husbandry, research on its role in swine health, performance, and management remains limited. This study evaluated the impacts on water quality after a 0.78% peracetic acid administration in water lines for 24 h between groups of pigs to remove water line mineral scale and biofilm. A secondary objective of the study was to evaluate if there were water quality differences between the water sample location (well source vs. rooms). Six, wean-to-finish swine farms in Iowa sourcing water from on-site wells were enrolled in the study and water samples were collected pre-treatment (0), post-treatment (1), and 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 42, 56, and 77 d post-treatment. Water samples were tested for minerals, nitrate, sulfate, total dissolved solids, on-farm temperature, on-farm and in-lab pH, total coliforms and

Indexed as

biofilmcoliformsswinetotal dissolved solidswater quality

Identifiers

PMID42781150
PMCPMC13600367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.