ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Long-term patient-reported outcomes and mechanical complications following spinal fusion in patients with surgical site infection managed with retained instrumentation versus non-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal fusion is frequently performed for degenerative and deformity spinal disorders, and surgical site infection (SSI) is one of its most consequential postoperative complications. Although implant retention is often pursued to preserve spinal stability and alignment, the impact of SSI on patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) and mechanical complications compared with non-infected patients is incompletely explored. This study aims to compare pain, disability, and mechanical outcomes between adult spinal fusion patients with SSI managed by retained instrumentation and non-infected controls. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through December 2025. Eligible studies included adult cohorts undergoing instrumented spinal fusion with SSI treated by implant retention and a non-infected comparison group. Primary outcomes were changes in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), representing PROM. Secondary outcomes included unplanned readmission, revision surgery excluding debridement, pseudarthrosis, and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Random-effects models were used to calculate standardized mean differences and odds ratios (ORs). Results: Eleven studies comprising 2,681 patients were included, with mean follow-up of 33.9 months (range, 22-70.7 months). Improvements in back pain VAS, leg pain VAS, and ODI did not differ significantly between SSI and non-SSI groups, showing comparable long-term functional recovery. In contrast, SSI managed with retained instrumentation was associated with significantly increased odds of unplanned readmission, revision surgery excluding debridement, and pseudarthrosis. No significant difference was observed in PJK. Substantial heterogeneity was present for several mechanical outcomes. Conclusions: In adult spinal fusion, patients with SSI managed with retained instrumentation demonstrated patient-reported outcomes comparable to non-infected controls. However, SSI is associated with increased mechanical complications and healthcare utilization. These findings support intensified surveillance, risk-adjusted counseling, and standardized outcome reporting for patients experiencing SSI after spinal fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.