Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781128›Full record

ArticleComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Development of machine learning-based multi-task quantitative structure-activity relationship models for predicting toxicities in six human organ systems.

Pei-Yu Wu, Wei-Chun Chou, Venkata N Kamineni, Chi-Yun Chen, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Chris D Vulpe, Zhoumeng Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pei-Yu WuDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Wei-Chun ChouDepartment of Environmental Sciences, College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Venkata N KamineniDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Chi-Yun ChenDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Jui-Hua HsiehNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Durham, NC 27709, USA.
Chris D VulpeCenter for Environmental and Human Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Zhoumeng LinDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional toxicity assessment relies heavily on animal testing, particularly for chemicals lacking toxicity data. This study developed machine learning (ML)-driven quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict human organ-specific toxicities, including cardiotoxicity, developmental toxicity, hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and reproductive toxicity. We collected in vivo data for 2,389 chemicals and Tox21 high-throughput screening data for 1,746 chemicals, resulting in 1,743 chemicals with matched datasets. Eighty-eight ML-based QSAR models were developed using three feature scenarios: (1) Tox21 data alone, (2) molecular descriptors alone, and (3) combined features. Five descriptor types and four ML algorithms (random forests, decision trees, support vector machines, and deep neural network [DNN]) were applied, with and without chi-square-based feature selection. Performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation and five metrics (recall, precision, balanced accuracy, F1 score, and ROC-AUC). DNN models in Scenario 2 performed best for developmental and neurotoxicity, while those in Scenario 3 outperformed others for the remaining toxicities. ROC-AUC values approached 0.8 across endpoints, and models without feature selection generally performed better. SHAP and contribution maps enhanced interpretability, highlighting key structural features of toxicity. This study demonstrates the potential of ML-assisted QSAR models for accurate multi-organ toxicity prediction, supporting drug development and chemical risk assessment.

Indexed as

computational toxicologyhigh-throughput screening (HTS)multi-task learningquantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)toxicity prediction

Identifiers

PMID42781128
PMCPMC13600336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.