ArticleBMJ public health2026
Beyond the tip of the iceberg: quantifying the odds of multidrug-resistance carriers for receiving post-acute follow-up rehabilitation after hospital stay - a real-world study using German data.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Health equity means equal opportunities for all patients. While follow-up rehabilitation (German: Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including patients considered for transfer to ≥281 PAC providers (1 November 2015 to 31 October 2017) from a tertiary care teaching hospital. Breaking down the whole process to different stages, we modelled the odds of dropping out at every stage under the exposure to MDRO-carriage via multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for various covariates. Results: Based on 12 386 patient records, our data estimates that 45% (95% CI 36% to 54%) of MDRO-carriers considered for AHB do not receive AHB. This indicates that the proportion of carriers denied admission (13% (95% CI 7% to 19%)) is only the tip of the iceberg and that earlier dropouts exist. Provider decisions might have influenced earlier dropouts, since admission non-approvals increased the odds of proposal non-approvals (OR=4.85 (95% CI 4.24 to 5.54)) in multivariable regression. Thereby, strongest exposure signals were observed for carriers of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) compared with other MDRO-types. Conclusion: Given the long-standing debate on the necessity of VRE-screening and the hardships of VRE-eradication, VRE-carriers in need of AHB would thus be further disadvantaged in addition to their already poorer conditions. This would lead to prolonged hospital stays, increased disability and ultimately elevated burden of disease and health expenditures at societal level. The balancing act between rehabilitation goals and adherence to best possible infection prevention measures would thus increase chances of carriers to receive much needed rehabilitation courses and ease individual as well as societal burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.