Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781042›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2026

Precision phage therapy in the AI/ML era: a systematic review of discovery-to-clinical translation evidence.

Najwa Menwer Alharbi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Najwa Menwer AlharbiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In precision phage therapy, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) is being applied for phage detection, genomes/proteome annotation, host prediction, resistance profiling and therapeutic optimization. Yet the landscape remains fragmented owing to a lack of systematic synthesis of its translational maturity, methodological robustness and pipeline coverage. We performed a systematic review of AI/ML tools relevant to precision phage therapy. Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and IEEE Xplore were used to identify records. Of 6,969 identified records, 2,214 duplicates were removed, leaving 4,755 unique records for title/abstract screening; 510 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 128 studies were included in the final synthesis. Studies were classified across a nine-module precision phage therapy pipeline by architectural family, validation maturity, accessibility, translational readiness (AI_PTRL), and methodological quality using an adapted PROBAST framework. The 128 included studies were published between 2012 and 2025, with a median publication year of 2023 and peak activity during 2022-2025. The large majority were methodological/tool development studies (115/128, 89.8%) and these predominantly described

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceartificial intelligenceclinical translationfoundation modelsgenome annotationgraph neural networkshost–phage interactionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42781042
PMCPMC13599804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.