ArticleEuropean oral research2026
Evaluation of malpractice fears and defensive approaches in orthodontists' clinical practice.
Article in European oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of medical malpractice litigation and associated defensive medicine practices on the clinical decision-making of orthodontists. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted between December 2025 and February 2026. Questionnaires were emailed to 2,526 orthodontists registered in the database of the Turkish Orthodontic Society (TOD), and 252 orthodontists completed the survey. Of the participants, 64.3% (n = 162) were female and 35.7% (n = 90) were male. In addition to demographic questions, participants completed the Fear of Medical Error Scale (FMS), the Defensive Medicine Practice Attitude Scale (DMPAS), and clinical preference questions specific to orthodontic practice. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Overall, 51.2% (n = 129) of the participants exhibited a high level of fear of medical malpractice. Orthodontists aged over 35 years had significantly lower FMS scores than younger orthodontists. According to the DMPAS, 53.6% of orthodontists exhibited a high level of defensive medicine behavior, while 15.5% exhibited a very high level. Conclusion: Orthodontists' clinical decision-making appears to be influenced by concerns about legal repercussions. To mitigate the legal pressure experienced by physicians, education in health law should be strengthened for physicians and other healthcare professionals, and medical malpractice legislation should be revised to provide a more balanced framework that also safeguards physicians' rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.