Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780997›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Artificial and emotional intelligence: two key forces for teachers' professional development in an era of uncertainty.

Myriam Liz Aponte, Ana Dolores Vargas Sánchez, Andrés Chiappe, Sandra Martínez-Pérez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Myriam Liz AponteEducation Faculty, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Ana Dolores Vargas SánchezEducation Faculty, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Andrés ChiappeEducation Faculty, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Sandra Martínez-PérezEducation Faculty, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expansion of artificial intelligence in education is moving faster than institutions' capacity to protect teacher wellbeing. Current debates often oscillate between technocentric optimism, which equates success with personalisation and scale, and pre-emptive rejection driven by fears of dehumanization. This conceptual and critical synthesis proposes a different evaluative criterion: AI may support teachers' socio-emotional professional development only when it functions as relational infrastructure rather than as a symbolic substitute for human accompaniment. The manuscript introduces relational densification as a criterion for examining whether AI-supported initiatives strengthen the professional relationships associated with teacher wellbeing, including trust, mentoring, peer support, collaboration, psychological safety, and reduced isolation. It also clarifies that these relationships may have downstream implications for students through classroom climate, pedagogical responsiveness, and socio-emotional support. The article distinguishes among different AI-mediated functions, including coordination systems, recommendation tools, analytics, conversational agents, and emotional AI, and examines their differentiated ethical and pedagogical risks. Particular attention is given to affective data governance, the political economy of educational AI, cultural and linguistic specificity, and critical AI literacy as a socio-emotional competence. The article concludes that AI-supported teacher development should be assessed not only by efficiency or personalisation, but by its capacity to expand, protect, and sustain human professional relationships.

Indexed as

affective data governanceartificial intelligencerelational densificationsocio-emotional trainingteacher wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42780997
PMCPMC13597924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.