ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
What is the preferred timing for surgery after proximal humerus fractures: an e-modified Delphi Survey Study.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Certain clinically selected proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) require operative treatment to preserve shoulder function. There is no consensus on the timing of surgery after PHFs, and guidelines are lacking. This study utilized the Delphi method to (1) find consensus on the preferred timing for multiple PHF patterns potentially requiring operative treatment and (2) assess statistical stability of consensus. Methods: A three-round electronic modified Delphi study was conducted between May and October 2025. Sixty-one shoulder experts from Australia, Europe, Asia, and North America participated. The expert panel assessed preferred time to surgery for PHF patterns potentially requiring surgery (either open reduction and internal fixation or arthroplasty) according to literature. The established timeframes were (a) within 2 days, (b) 3-5 days, (c) 6-14 days, or (d) after 14 days of initial trauma. Consensus was predefined as ≥80% agreement among experts and stable consensus as ≥80% agreement in both second and third rounds. Results: For open reduction and internal fixation, consensus was observed to treat PHFs with ≥35% intra-articular involvement within 3-5 days, and plexopathy with distal motor and/or sensory symptoms within 2 days. Stable consensus was reached to treat dislocation of the humeral head to the axilla and vascular compromise with adequate distal perfusion within 2 days. Closed vascular injury with active bleeding in hemodynamically unstable patients or distal vascular deficits should be treated immediately but could wait up to 2 days in hemodynamically stable patients with adequate distal perfusion. For arthroplasty, consensus was achieved to treat PHFs with varus malalignment of the humeral head or (almost) complete translation of the shaft within 6-14 days. Stable consensus was observed to perform arthroplasty within 2 days for PHFs with dislocation of the humeral head to the axilla with plexopathy or vascular compromise with adequate distal perfusion within 2 days. Conclusion: This study provides insights on consensus among international shoulder surgeons for preferred timing of surgery for PHFs for urgent indications. Importantly, consensus was not achieved for most non-emergent PHFs, underscoring the area of uncertainty in clinical practice regarding the optimal treatment window. This study highlights the absence of agreement and lack of high-quality evidence to guide physicians on the timing of operative treatment for PHFs and can be a starting point for further clinical research and developing guidelines on the timing of surgical interventions for PHFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.