Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780974›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026

What is the preferred timing for surgery after proximal humerus fractures: an e-modified Delphi Survey Study.

Stijn R J Mennes, Huub H de Klerk, Reinier W A Spek, Neal C Chen, Ross K Leighton, Bhavin Jadav, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Job N Doornberg, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Timing for Shoulder Surgery Consortium (TSSC)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stijn R J MennesDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Huub H de KlerkFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Reinier W A SpekDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Neal C ChenHand and Arm Research Collaborative, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachussets General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Ross K LeightonDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Bhavin JadavDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Ruurd L JaarsmaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Job N DoornbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Michel P J van den BekeromFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Timing for Shoulder Surgery Consortium (TSSC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Certain clinically selected proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) require operative treatment to preserve shoulder function. There is no consensus on the timing of surgery after PHFs, and guidelines are lacking. This study utilized the Delphi method to (1) find consensus on the preferred timing for multiple PHF patterns potentially requiring operative treatment and (2) assess statistical stability of consensus. Methods: A three-round electronic modified Delphi study was conducted between May and October 2025. Sixty-one shoulder experts from Australia, Europe, Asia, and North America participated. The expert panel assessed preferred time to surgery for PHF patterns potentially requiring surgery (either open reduction and internal fixation or arthroplasty) according to literature. The established timeframes were (a) within 2 days, (b) 3-5 days, (c) 6-14 days, or (d) after 14 days of initial trauma. Consensus was predefined as ≥80% agreement among experts and stable consensus as ≥80% agreement in both second and third rounds. Results: For open reduction and internal fixation, consensus was observed to treat PHFs with ≥35% intra-articular involvement within 3-5 days, and plexopathy with distal motor and/or sensory symptoms within 2 days. Stable consensus was reached to treat dislocation of the humeral head to the axilla and vascular compromise with adequate distal perfusion within 2 days. Closed vascular injury with active bleeding in hemodynamically unstable patients or distal vascular deficits should be treated immediately but could wait up to 2 days in hemodynamically stable patients with adequate distal perfusion. For arthroplasty, consensus was achieved to treat PHFs with varus malalignment of the humeral head or (almost) complete translation of the shaft within 6-14 days. Stable consensus was observed to perform arthroplasty within 2 days for PHFs with dislocation of the humeral head to the axilla with plexopathy or vascular compromise with adequate distal perfusion within 2 days. Conclusion: This study provides insights on consensus among international shoulder surgeons for preferred timing of surgery for PHFs for urgent indications. Importantly, consensus was not achieved for most non-emergent PHFs, underscoring the area of uncertainty in clinical practice regarding the optimal treatment window. This study highlights the absence of agreement and lack of high-quality evidence to guide physicians on the timing of operative treatment for PHFs and can be a starting point for further clinical research and developing guidelines on the timing of surgical interventions for PHFs.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyConsensusDelphiORIFProximal humerus fracturesSurgeryTiming

Identifiers

PMID42780974
PMCPMC13599625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.