Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780961›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

The perceived fit of guided iCBT in specialised mental healthcare services: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.

Beate Standal, Robin Maria Francisca Kenter, Monika Knudsen Gullslett, Tine Nordgreen, Inger Lise Teig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beate StandalDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Robin Maria Francisca KenterResearch Centre for Digital Mental Health Services, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Monika Knudsen GullslettNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tine NordgreenResearch Centre for Digital Mental Health Services, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Inger Lise TeigDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (guided iCBT) is an effective treatment for common mental disorders and has the potential to improve access to care. However, its integration into routine practice remains limited. This study explored healthcare professionals' perceptions of the suitability of guided iCBT in specialised mental healthcare and examined how perceived fit influences implementation across clinical and organisational contexts. Methods: Semi-structured interviews and participatory observations were conducted at three specialised mental health clinics in Norway that offered guided iCBT to adults with anxiety and depression. Thirty-one healthcare professionals were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches. The deductive analysis was informed by Lau et al.'s framework of contextual fit, which conceptualises fit as alignment between an intervention and professional, organisational, and external contexts. Results: Healthcare professionals' perceptions of fit varied across contextual levels and influenced the implementation of guided iCBT. At the intervention level, participants identified a perceived mismatch between the evidence base for guided iCBT and limitations in its technological design, which was viewed as insufficiently aligned with contemporary therapeutic practices. At the professional level, differing professional values and therapeutic norms shaped perceptions of appropriateness and acceptability. At the organisational level, limited readiness for implementation and concerns about patient complexity in specialised care settings contributed to doubts about the intervention's suitability. At the external level, tensions emerged between evidence-based expectations and prevailing clinical assumptions favouring face-to-face care, further affecting perceptions of fit and legitimacy. Conclusions: The findings suggest that implementing guided iCBT in specialised mental healthcare depends on aligning the intervention with the clinical, organisational, and broader system contexts in which it is introduced. Efforts to improve technological usability, strengthen organisational readiness, engage clinicians, and address assumptions about legitimate forms of therapy may enhance perceived fit and support sustained implementation of guided iCBT.

Indexed as

digital mental healthe-healthhealthcare professionalimplementationinternet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy iCBTmental healthqualitative studytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID42780961
PMCPMC13597905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.