ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
The perceived fit of guided iCBT in specialised mental healthcare services: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (guided iCBT) is an effective treatment for common mental disorders and has the potential to improve access to care. However, its integration into routine practice remains limited. This study explored healthcare professionals' perceptions of the suitability of guided iCBT in specialised mental healthcare and examined how perceived fit influences implementation across clinical and organisational contexts. Methods: Semi-structured interviews and participatory observations were conducted at three specialised mental health clinics in Norway that offered guided iCBT to adults with anxiety and depression. Thirty-one healthcare professionals were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches. The deductive analysis was informed by Lau et al.'s framework of contextual fit, which conceptualises fit as alignment between an intervention and professional, organisational, and external contexts. Results: Healthcare professionals' perceptions of fit varied across contextual levels and influenced the implementation of guided iCBT. At the intervention level, participants identified a perceived mismatch between the evidence base for guided iCBT and limitations in its technological design, which was viewed as insufficiently aligned with contemporary therapeutic practices. At the professional level, differing professional values and therapeutic norms shaped perceptions of appropriateness and acceptability. At the organisational level, limited readiness for implementation and concerns about patient complexity in specialised care settings contributed to doubts about the intervention's suitability. At the external level, tensions emerged between evidence-based expectations and prevailing clinical assumptions favouring face-to-face care, further affecting perceptions of fit and legitimacy. Conclusions: The findings suggest that implementing guided iCBT in specialised mental healthcare depends on aligning the intervention with the clinical, organisational, and broader system contexts in which it is introduced. Efforts to improve technological usability, strengthen organisational readiness, engage clinicians, and address assumptions about legitimate forms of therapy may enhance perceived fit and support sustained implementation of guided iCBT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.