Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780921›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Analysis of the characteristics and differences in exercise participation among seven occupational categories of female workers in China-a cross-sectional survey of 31 provinces across the country.

Xiao-Zhe Qin, Min Li, Zhen-Feng Liu, Xin-Yue Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiao-Zhe QinSchool of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Min LiDepartment of Social Sports, Henan Institute of Physical Education, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhen-Feng LiuSchool of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Xin-Yue LiSchool of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding Physical exercise behavioral variations across female occupations is crucial for tailoring interventions and promoting occupational health. This study evaluates physical exercise rates, preferences, motivations, and barriers among Chinese working women. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 3,740 female participants across seven occupational categories in 31 Chinese provinces. Physical exercise behavior was assessed using the Physical Exercise Rating Scale; exercise types were classified according to China's National Fitness Guidelines; exercise motivation was developed based on Self-Determination Theory; and multi-level participation barriers were measured under the socioecological framework for women's physical activity. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, Chi-square tests, and multiple linear regression. Results: (1) Exercise intensity per session was generally low, with significant occupational differences in intensity ( Conclusion: Occupational resources, labor types, and workplace cultures stratify physical exercise participation among Chinese women. Public-sector employees enjoy institutional resource advantages, while rural and migrant women face structural deficits. We should start from the workplace and promote differentiated and compensatory public sports services based on occupational characteristics.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorOccupationsWomen, WorkingAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultfemale workersphysical exercise motivationphysical participationsocioecological barrierswomen’s physical exercise

Identifiers

PMID42780921
PMCPMC13597825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.