ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
First-day lactate trajectories and subsequent in-hospital mortality in cardiogenic shock: a landmark multicohort study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lactate in cardiogenic shock is commonly summarized by a single measurement or a two-point estimate of clearance, although its first-day pattern may offer a more interpretable account of early clinical evolution. We examined whether first-day lactate trajectories identify reproducible patterns associated with subsequent mortality. Methods: This retrospective multicohort study used MIMIC-IV for trajectory discovery and internal prediction modeling and eICU-CRD to evaluate transportability. Adults with a first ICU admission for cardiogenic shock and at least two lactate measurements within 24 h were eligible for trajectory construction. Primary analyses were restricted to patients alive and still hospitalized at a 24-hour landmark. Results: Four patterns were identified among 2,181 eligible MIMIC-IV patients: low-stable, moderate-decreasing, high-decreasing, and persistent-high. The 24-hour landmark risk set included 2,015 patients, with subsequent mortality ranging from 24.34% to 72.88%. Compared with low-stable, adjusted odds ratios were 2.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56-2.77] for high-decreasing and 5.81 (95% CI 3.57-9.46) for persistent-high. After centering each trajectory at its initial window, the increasing pattern remained associated with mortality after adjustment for initial lactate and clinical covariates (odds ratio 2.91, 95% CI 1.75-4.85, vs. the largest-decrease pattern). In foldwise cross-validation, the trajectory model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.724 and an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.572. Last lactate and initial plus last lactate performed better (AUROC 0.734 and 0.736; AUPRC 0.592 and 0.594). Among 429 landmark-eligible eICU-CRD patients assigned to fixed MIMIC-IV centroids, mortality ranged from 25.49% to 78.12%; in 366 complete cases, the adjusted risk ratio for group 4 was 2.30 (95% CI 1.47-3.62). Conclusion: First-day lactate trajectories provided a clinically interpretable framework for characterizing lactate burden and evolution after repeated testing. The low-stable and persistent-high extremes showed the most consistent cross-database separation, whereas the four-group partition should be interpreted as a descriptive continuum rather than four validated clinical risk classes. Simpler last-lactate summaries provided better discrimination when prediction alone was the objective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.