ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026
Contraceptive ever-use among women of reproductive age in Northern Ghana: a comparative analysis of logistic regression, LASSO penalised regression, and random forest machine learning approaches.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contraceptive uptake in Northern Ghana remains low despite high awareness, suggesting barriers not fully captured by additive models. This study compared logistic regression, LASSO, and Random Forest to predict contraceptive ever-use and identify determinants among women in Tamale Metropolis. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional survey (January-April 2023) included 414 women aged 15-49 from three public health facilities. Outcome: contraceptive ever-use. Twelve predictors included knowledge/attitude scores, wealth tertile, education, parity, marital status, occupation, age, cultural barriers, health worker attitudes, and information source. Model discrimination was assessed via AUC with 95% CIs; LASSO used 10-fold cross-validation ( Results: Random Forest achieved highest discrimination (AUC=0.865, 95% CI:0.83-0.90), outperforming logistic regression (AUC=0.727) and LASSO (AUC=0.723) (both Conclusions: Random Forest provided better discrimination and may complement regression for prediction, though regression remains essential for interpretable effect estimates. Attitude change, education, and counselling quality are priority targets. The inverse wealth association warrants qualitative investigation, as polygyny, religiosity, and partner dynamics were unmeasured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.