ArticleRespiratory research & clinical practice2026
Foreign bodies in the tracheobronchial tree: clinical and radiological analysis of cases over a 50-year period.
Article in Respiratory research & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze cases of foreign body (FB) aspiration in the last 50 years, describing clinical presentations, radiological characteristics, extraction methods, complications, and surgical interventions. Methods: A documentary study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of patients diagnosed with FB aspiration in the 1976-2025 period at the São Paulo State University School of Medicine Hospital, located in the city of Botucatu, Brazil. Results: A total of 240 patients were analyzed; 60% were male, with a median age of 3 years (IQR, 1-10 years). A history consistent with FB aspiration was present in 82%. Radiological findings included atelectasis, in 30.7%; radiopaque FBs, in 22.6%; normal chest X-rays, in 19.2%; and hyperinflation, in 18.3%. Rigid bronchoscopy was performed in 92% of the patients, flexible bronchoscopy was performed in 3.5%, and laryngoscopy was performed in 1.3%. In 3%, the FB was spontaneously expelled. The sensitivity of clinical and radiological findings was 83% and 83.2%, respectively. Ten patients required surgery, and 79 developed complications. Conclusions: Any suspected FB aspiration should be investigated, even when clinical and radiological findings are negative. Prolonged FB retention in the bronchial tree can lead to severe and irreversible complications. Most FBs are radiolucent, predominantly consisting of grains or seeds. Endoscopic removal remains the mainstay of treatment, with only a minority of cases requiring surgery. Early intervention is essential to prevent complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.