ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
A novel assessment of self-perceptions of recovery from illness and injury in U.S. Navy service members.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: There is no measure that assesses self-perceptions of recovery in service members. This report describes the development and validation of the Military Illness and Injury Recovery Scale-17 (MIIRS-17) in a sample of active duty personnel. Methods and measures: Participants ( Results: The final 17-item scale was highly consistent with four subscales, which we termed immune recovery, musculoskeletal injury recovery, physical recovery, and rehabilitation response. Total recovery and relevant correlates were related in the expected directions. In the combined model, eight predictors and age explained 39.6% of variance in total recovery. Sleep disruption, resilience, and age, independently contributed to total recovery. Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicate that the MIIRS-17 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing self-perceptions of recovery in military members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.