SynthesisRespiratory research & clinical practice2026
Clinical effects of N-acetylcysteine in ICU patients with respiratory disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Respiratory research & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Critically ill patients with respiratory disease often experience impaired airway clearance, which contributes to adverse clinical outcomes. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has mucolytic and antioxidant properties, and may have therapeutic potential in this setting. This study evaluated the impact of NAC on clinical outcomes in ICU patients with underlying respiratory disease. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from January of 2000 to July of 2025 in order to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating NAC in ICU patients with respiratory conditions. Primary outcomes included hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. Data were synthesized using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the route of NAC administration. Results: Five randomized controlled trials comprising 340 patients were included. Hospital mortality was 44.76% in the NAC group and 47.61% in the control group (OR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.49-1.53). No significant differences were observed in ventilation duration (mean difference [MD] = 0.79 days; 95% CI: -2.87 to 4.44) or ICU LOS (MD = 0.21 days; 95% CI: -3.75 to 4.17). However, NAC was associated with a shorter hospital stay (MD = -3.84 days; 95% CI: -7.44 to -0.24). Subgroup analysis suggested variability in mortality outcomes based on administration route. Conclusions: NAC may reduce hospital LOS in critically ill patients with respiratory disease, although its effects on mortality and ventilation duration remain inconclusive. These findings may inform future research, particularly in patients with post-infectious lung damage such as that seen in COVID-19 or tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.