ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Acceptance and commitment therapy for moral injury: conceptualizing and intervening on moral injury through the lens of contextual behavioral science.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Moral injury is at a critical juncture in its conceptualization. Current dominant approaches to conceptualizing and assessing moral injury are rooted in syndromal frameworks with implicit medical model assumptions. In these approaches, painful moral emotions and cognitions are often conceptualized as pathological symptoms to be reduced or corrected. Such approaches risk pathologizing deeply human moral responses and may inadvertently position clinicians as arbiters of which moral appraisals or emotional reactions are appropriate, proportionate, or adaptive. In this paper, we present Contextual Behavioral Science (CBS), the philosophical foundation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Moral Injury (ACT-MI), as an alternative framework for conceptualizing and treating moral injury without pathologizing moral pain or requiring clinicians to adjudicate the validity of clients' moral judgments. Drawing on CBS, Relational Frame Theory (RFT), and evolutionary science, we examine the social functions of moral emotions, the human capacity to construct verbal moral narratives, and the implications of these processes for intervention. Building on these foundations, ACT-MI is described as an approach aimed at disrupting the behavioral patterns that maintain moral injury at both individual and group levels. Rather than targeting moral pain to reduce symptoms, using ACT-MI can facilitate transforming the individual's relationship to it. Through functional assessment, clients' efforts to avoid, control, or resolve moral pain are identified and addressed with core ACT processes, including acceptance, defusion, contact with the present moment, self-as-context, values, and committed action. Within this framework, individuals learn to hold moral pain while continuing to engage in values-based living and meaningful social functioning at individual and group levels of treatment. Assessment targets, methods, and hypotheses are identified to support testing the mechanisms and impacts of ACT-MI in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.