Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780749›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2026

Digital Quantification of Membrane DAB Immunohistochemical Staining in FFPE Cervical Cancer Tissues Using an Open-Source CellProfiler Pipeline.

Kripa Krishnakumar, Nuha Rasheed, Nadira Nithyanandan, Roopak Murali, Leena Dennis Joseph, Ganesh Venkatraman, Rajesh Kumar Gandhirajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kripa KrishnakumarDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.
Nuha RasheedDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.
Nadira NithyanandanDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.
Roopak MuraliDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.
Leena Dennis JosephDepartment of Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.
Ganesh VenkatramanDepartment of Bio-Medical Sciences, School of Bio Sciences & Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Rajesh Kumar GandhirajanDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a highly specific and widely used laboratory technique for assessing protein localization and expression in tissue samples. Interpretation of 3,3' diamino benzidine (DAB)-based IHC is often based on observer-dependent manual scoring or traditional imaging software, which may show variability in DAB staining quantification. Furthermore, conventional image analysis tools often face limitations in precisely defining cell boundaries and quantifying membrane-specific signals. In this study, we present a standardized image analysis workflow using CellProfiler, an open-source software for image analysis for the quantification of membrane staining intensity in IHC images captured from slides prepared using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human cervical cancer tissue sections. The image analysis workflow was demonstrated using ASCT2 (SLC1A5), a membrane-localized amino acid transporter, as a representative biomarker for membrane-associated protein expression. This protocol involves image preprocessing, object identification, segmentation, and intensity measurement modules to distinguish cell membranes from cytoplasmic regions, enabling automated quantification of membrane intensity signals. The CellProfiler pipeline demonstrated improved accuracy in cell boundary identification and quantification of membrane-specific staining intensity. This is a rapid quantification process, since processing of each image only takes a few seconds; therefore, the analysis for 100 images can be performed within 10-15 min. This segmentation and quantification strategy is applicable to other membrane-based biomarkers after appropriate optimization of segmentation parameters. Following further minor modifications to the object identification modules, this pipeline can be used to detect and quantify cytoplasm- or nuclei-localized DAB-IHC markers across different tissue types. Overall, this protocol provides a standardized, user-friendly, and reproducible workflow for quantitative IHC image analysis that can be broadly applied to the study of protein biomarkers of different localizations, such as nuclei, cytoplasm, and cell membranes from different tissue types. Key features • Quantification of membrane-specific staining intensity in immunohistochemistry (IHC) images using a customized CellProfiler analysis pipeline. • Accurate delineation of cell boundaries, allowing separation of membrane and cytoplasmic signal regions. • Reproducible stepwise workflow adaptable to multiple tissue types and membrane protein biomarkers. • Applicability to studies of membrane-localized biomarkers, such as ASCT2, in cancer research.

Indexed as

CancerCellProfiler Imaging softwareDigital pathologyImage analysisImmunohistochemistryMembrane protein quantification

Identifiers

PMID42780749
PMCPMC13598660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.