ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Physicians' opinions on GBV: a qualitative pilot study in South Africa.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: South Africa has seen a rise in gender-based violence (GBV), which now ranks as a top contributor to years of life lost for women. GBV is a significant public health challenge. Physicians and other medical professionals need targeted knowledge and skills for an adequate response. This study assessed South African physicians' understanding and opinions on GBV care. It also explored the effects on physicians treating survivors. Methods: To assess the understanding and opinions of practicing physicians in South Africa, the study used a qualitative method. One mini focus group discussion (mini-FGD) included four physicians from four provinces. This was followed by one in-depth interview (IDI). Researchers conducted thematic analysis using Atlas.ti. They organized themes based on guided prompts. Results: Physicians identified structural and social barriers like societal issues, inefficient systems, lack of collaborative efforts for GBV, community factors affecting the care, personal financing for GBV care that block survivor access to GBV care. Survivors often return to unsafe environments because of poor support services. Physicians reported stress, fatigue, and helplessness while responding to GBV survivors. While physicians are motivated by empathy to help survivors, they also experience trauma due to the growing number of GBV cases. Conclusion: The high incidence of GBV in South Africa demands comprehensive attention. Physicians recognized GBV care as a complex socioeconomic and public health issue. They reported that enhanced cooperation between the government and the private sector, with a focus on funding prevention and strengthening infrastructure, would improve care for survivors of GBV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.