Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780693›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Current therapeutic strategies and available research models for investigating hypertrophic scars.

Alexa Chu, Suneel Kumar, Francois Berthiaume

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexa ChuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Suneel KumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Francois BerthiaumeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal scarring, such as hypertrophic and keloid scars, are a result of pathological skin wound healing, and can reduce quality of life through psychological factors, persistent pain, and reduced mobility. Under physiological conditions, wounds proceed sequentially through the hemostatic, inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling phases of healing. However, dysregulated wound healing can overstimulate fibrotic activity, resulting in the development of hypertrophic or keloid scars. These scars present a significant clinical challenge, as hypertrophic scars develop in more than 70% of burn survivors with a 40%-94% incidence rate following surgery. While hypertrophic and keloid scars are a common health concern, treatment options are limited due to the complex nature of pathological scar development. Furthermore, the development of new therapeutics is complicated by limitations in research models mimicking scars

Indexed as

collagenfibrosishypertrophic scarremodelingscarspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID42780693
PMCPMC13598706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.