ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Faster to react, slower to move: differential effects of multisensory facilitation on movement initiation and execution across the adult lifespan.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spanning multisensory integration, ageing, attention, and motor control, this study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine how audiovisual integration differentially influences the initiation and execution of goal-directed motor actions across the adult lifespan. Methods: Young adults (<30 years) and older adults (between 50 and 69 years and ≥70 years) completed a simple detection task and a visual discrimination task on a portable touchscreen device. In the detection task, participants tapped to indicate the perceived location of auditory, visual, or audiovisual stimuli. In the discrimination task, they responded to a visual target presented either with or without distractors, accompanied by auditory stimulation that was either spatially aligned or misaligned with the target. Results: Across both tasks, multisensory stimulation significantly reduced reaction times in younger and older adults, whereas movement speed slowed modestly, most reliably in the detection task and under audiovisual distraction during visual discrimination. Distractors disproportionately impaired performance in older adults, but spatially aligned auditory information partly alleviated this effect, especially in the oldest group. Importantly, these modest movement-speed costs did not outweigh the overall facilitation of goal-directed actions. Discussion: The results suggest that multisensory signals enhance rapid motor planning and initiation, followed by a later calibration phase that improves precision during movement execution. They also indicate that the spatial window of multisensory integration may narrow in the presence of distractors, particularly in older adults. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that multisensory facilitation remains functionally advantageous even under distracting conditions, albeit at a relatively small task-dependent cost to movement speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.