Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780670›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

The reliability and measurement error of the movement quality assessment for athletes.

Gyan A Wijekulasuriya, Carl T Woods, Aden Kittel, Paul Larkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gyan A WijekulasuriyaInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Carl T WoodsInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aden KittelInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paul LarkinInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Methods: The athletic movement quality of 50 adolescent athletes (age: 16.1 ± 0.6 years, mass: 81.7 ± 6.1 kg, height: 173.9 ± 10.5 cm) was measured using the MQA-A by two experienced raters, both live and via video. Intra-rater reliability was determined using the movement quality scores of a single rater, inter-rater reliability was determined for live and video scores and agreement between live and video scoring methods were assessed. Results: Intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability for video and live scoring methods was evident (ICC ≥ 0.90, Discussion: Thus, the MQA-A offers a reliable tool for measuring athletic movement quality in adolescent athletes.

Indexed as

adolescent athletemeasurement errormovement competencymovement screeningyouth athletic development

Identifiers

PMID42780670
PMCPMC13597740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.