ArticleRSC advances2026
Targeting DYRK1A with rationally designed pyrazine-guanidine hybrids for Alzheimer's disease: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by regulating tau hyperphosphorylation and neuroinflammatory pathways, suggesting DYRK1A as an important therapeutic target. Herein, we report the rational design, synthesis and evaluation of a new class of low-molecular-weight pyrazine-guanidine molecular hybrids as potential DYRK1A inhibitors
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.