Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780654›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

All things are active … new approach methods for excipient safety.

Thomas Hartung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas HartungCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excipients make up the majority of most medicines by mass, yet they are still called "inactive," still largely qualified against a 2005 guidance, and still assessed product by product with animal studies that answer the wrong questions. The past decade has dismantled the "inactive" assumption: polyethylene glycol and polysorbate anaphylaxis, benzyl alcohol gasping syndrome, propylene glycol acidosis, benzalkonium bronchospasm, and the recurrent diethylene glycol mass poisonings of children all show that excipient risk is real, but that it is contextual rather than intrinsic. I argue that this contextual character makes excipients an almost ideal proving ground for New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). Excipient hazard depends on route, dose, duration, formulation, impurities, and patient population-exactly the variables that exposure science, computational toxicology, and human

Indexed as

context of useexcipientsexposure scienceimmunotoxicityinactive ingredientsnanomedicineNew Approach Methodologies (NAMs)pediatric safety

Identifiers

PMID42780654
PMCPMC13597672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.