ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting prognosis in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate an interpretable nomogram that integrates an imaging score, clinical characteristics, and machine-learning models to predict 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and large-vessel occlusion (LVO). Methods: We analyzed 240 AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO who underwent one-stop multimodal CT between October 2019 and December 2024. Fifty-two variables, including pretreatment clinical features, conventional and advanced imaging, and angiographic characteristics, were assessed. The 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS-90) was used as the prognostic endpoint; good and poor outcomes were defined as mRS-90 ≤ 2 and > 2, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned to training (80%, Results: Among 240 patients, 162 (67.5%) had unfavorable 90-day functional outcomes. Patients with unfavorable outcomes were generally older, had higher admission NIHSS scores, and showed less favorable collateral and perfusion profiles. Age, admission NIHSS score, and onset-to-CT time were retained as clinical predictors, while eight imaging features were integrated into the imaging score. Adding the imaging score did not significantly improve discrimination in the testing cohort (ΔAUC, 0.0078; 95% CI, -0.0071 to 0.0227; Conclusions: An interpretable model combining routine clinical predictors with a multimodal CT-derived imaging score demonstrates promising predictive potential for 90-day functional outcome in patients with AIS-LVO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.