Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780588›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Finite element analysis of medial meniscus tears and related surgical techniques with biomechanical validation.

Chengyue Yu, Kexin Liu, Jingyu Zhang, Wenjun Zhao, Xiaoyuan Duan, Bo Liu, Lupeng Wang, Zhao Liu, Yongxin Huo, Tao Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chengyue Yu *Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Kexin Liu *Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Jingyu ZhangTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Wenjun ZhaoTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoyuan DuanTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Bo LiuChangchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jilin, China.
Lupeng WangTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Zhao LiuTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yongxin HuoThe Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Tao ZhangTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Guosheng XingTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Weiguo XuTianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study established finite element models of the knee incorporating radial and longitudinal meniscal tears and simulated corresponding surgical techniques to investigate the influence of different tear types, lengths, locations on stress distribution in the knee joint and evaluate the restorative effects of different surgical techniques on the biomechanical performance of the meniscus. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model of the right knee including bone and soft tissues was developed. Stable and unstable radial and longitudinal tear models were created in the posterior horn of the meniscus across three zones (white-white, red-white, and red-red zones), together with the corresponding surgical technique models (suture repair and partial meniscectomy). Finite element analysis was performed under static loading. A cadaveric knee biomechanical experiment was also conducted to validate the finite element model. Results: Under static loading, the discrepancy in medial compartment contact area between the finite element model and the cadaveric experiment under intact meniscus conditions was 5.72%. The peak contact pressure was highest in the unstable radial tear model, reaching 14.88 MPa, representing an 181.82% increase compared with 5.28 MPa measured in the intact meniscus. Both repair and partial meniscectomy significantly reduced the peak contact pressure in the medial meniscus and tibial cartilage for radial tears. Repair reduced the peak pressure by 35.35% for stable radial tears, while partial meniscectomy reduced it by 49.60% for unstable radial tears. Meniscal repair reduced the peak contact pressure by 4.55% and 3.85% for stable longitudinal tears located in the red and white zones, respectively, and restored hoop stress transmission. Partial meniscectomy reduced the peak contact pressure by 7.90% (0.67 MPa) for unstable longitudinal tears located in the white zone. Conclusion: Stress distribution in the meniscus and its components is influenced by tear types, locations, lengths, and surgical technique. Surgical outcomes significantly depend on tear types, lengths, and locations. The extent of biomechanical restoration varies considerably among different surgical techniques, suggesting that clinical procedure selection should be based on personalized consideration of injury characteristics.

Indexed as

longitudinal tearmedial meniscusmeniscectomymeniscus repairradial tear

Identifiers

PMID42780588
PMCPMC13597668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.