Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780529›Full record

ArticleJSES international2026

Corrective osteotomies of malunited proximal humerus fractures with 3D patient-specific guides: a feasibility study.

Stijn R J Mennes, Anne M L Meesters, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Job N Doornberg, Frank F A IJpma, Nick Assink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stijn R J MennesDepartment of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Anne M L MeestersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michel P J van den BekeromShoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruurd L JaarsmaDepartment of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Job N DoornbergDepartment of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Frank F A IJpmaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nick AssinkDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Corrective osteotomies for malunions after proximal humerus fractures are reserved for selected cases. These procedures are technically demanding, and surgical planning based on two-dimensional imaging, with free-hand operative correction, may lead to surgical inaccuracy. Three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning combined with patient-specific surgical guides and surgical simulation can overcome this issue. This study introduces 3D patient-specific guides for corrective osteotomies in proximal humeral malunions and determines the accuracy of achieved correction in human cadaveric shoulders with 2 innovative surgical techniques. Methods: Seven reversed corrective osteotomies were planned and performed on 4 Thiel-embalmed human specimens using 7 different respective 3D patient-specific cutting and reduction guides. Computed tomography scans were used to create 3D segmentations of all specimens. Subsequently, virtual surgical plans of osteotomies were created, and 3D-printed patient-specific cutting and reposition guides were designed and produced. Three humeri underwent an "extracapsular" corrective osteotomy, and 4 humeri underwent correction using a novel "humeral head-tuberosity separation" technique. Accuracy was assessed for valgus angulation and rotation by comparing pre-operative planning with post-operative results quantified with computed tomography scans. Results: The overall median difference between pre-operative planning and post-operative results was 5.2° (min-max: 2.9°-8.5°) for rotation and 3.4° (min-max: 2.4°-5.8°) for valgus angulation. For the "extracapsular" method, the median difference was 5.2° (min-max: 2.9°-7.0°) for rotation and 3.9° (min-max: 3.2°-5.8°) for valgus angulation. The median differences in rotation and valgus angulation for the "humeral head-tuberosity separation" corrections were 6.3° (min-max: 3.6°-8.5°) and 3.1° (min-max: 2.4°-3.6°), respectively. Conclusion: The application of 3D surgical planning and patient-specific guides is feasible for corrective osteotomies of malunited proximal humerus and resulted in reconstructions with less than 10° deviation from pre-operative planning, demonstrating acceptable technical accuracy and supporting the potential of this approach for future clinical application. The extracapsular osteotomy technique may serve as a solution for malunions with an intact anatomic relationship between the humeral head and greater tuberosity, whereas the novel osteotomy may be a solution for severe malunions with disrupted anatomy between the humeral head, greater tuberosity, and surgical neck. Future studies need to evaluate the use of the proposed techniques in patients with actual proximal humeral malunions.

Indexed as

3D technologyCorrective osteotomyMalunionPatient-specific surgical guidesProximal humerus fractureVirtual surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID42780529
PMCPMC13598186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.