ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Single-position lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion: anatomic considerations, workflow optimization, and technical nuances.
Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the single-position combined anterior-posterior approach has emerged as an increasingly utilized technique in lumbar fusion surgery. The approach combining posterior pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) performed in the lateral decubitus position is referred to as the lateral ALIF. Compared to traditional approaches that involve flipping the patient mid-surgery or staging the surgery at multiple time points, single-position lateral ALIF has been associated with shorter operative times, reduced estimated blood loss (EBL), shorter hospital length of stay, and lower rates of postoperative ileus, while maintaining comparable rates of fusion, complications, and reoperation. The lateral position also facilitates access to the retroperitoneal space through gravitational displacement of the abdominal contents and can permit simultaneous anterior and posterior surgical exposure. However, safe and effective execution of this approach requires familiarity with the unique anatomic, vascular, and workflow considerations associated with lateral positioning. The purpose of this review is to describe the technical details of single-position lateral ALIF surgery, focusing on surgical anatomy, indications and patient selection, surgical technique, workflow optimization, integration of navigation technologies, and perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes. Preoperative assessment of spinopelvic alignment, vascular anatomy, psoas morphology, and prior abdominal surgery is essential. Intraoperatively, coordinated positioning, simultaneous anterior and posterior exposure, and integration of fluoroscopy, navigation, or robotic assistance can facilitate efficient and accurate placement of instrumentation. Current evidence suggests that single-position lateral ALIF provides comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes to traditional dual-position approaches; however, existing studies are predominantly retrospective and heterogeneous, and long-term clinical outcomes remain incompletely characterized. This review provides a practical framework for surgeons seeking to incorporate single-position lateral ALIF into their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.