ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
ctDNA and immune biomarker testing for molecular residual disease surveillance and immune stratification in cancer.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular residual disease (MRD) refers to occult cancer persisting below the detection limit of conventional imaging and is a major source of later relapse. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides a minimally invasive molecular surrogate of residual disease, but its interpretation is influenced by tumor burden, shedding, anatomic site, treatment-related cell death, sampling time, and analytical sensitivity. Immune biomarkers provide complementary information on whether residual disease is being recognized, contained, or permitted to escape by the host immune system. This Mini Review examines how ctDNA and immune biomarker testing can be integrated for MRD surveillance and immune stratification across solid tumors. We summarize tumor-informed and tumor-naïve ctDNA approaches, including mutation-, methylation-, fragmentomic-, and whole-genome-based assays; discuss tissue and blood immune biomarkers such as PD-L1, mismatch repair status, tumor mutational burden, antigen-presentation integrity, T-cell receptor repertoires, cytokines, and suppressive myeloid populations; and review recent evidence from colorectal, lung, urothelial, breast, and melanoma studies. We propose a conceptual, hypothesis-generating framework in which ctDNA reports tumor-derived molecular signal and shedding, whereas immune assays report immune pressure and escape. Joint interpretation may, if prospectively validated, distinguish biologically different MRD states, improve longitudinal risk assessment, and provide a laboratory foundation for biomarker-oriented immunotherapy and cell-therapy studies. However, clinical implementation requires standardized preanalytics, explicit assay limits, paired leukocyte controls, serial sampling, harmonized immune assays, and prospective trials demonstrating clinical utility rather than prognostic association alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.