Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780475›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Planetary health in practice: A scoping review of education and training for nurses and midwives.

Sadia Afrin, Pascal Petit, Nicolas Vuillerme, Muhammad Asaduzzaman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sadia AfrinDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Pascal PetitUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG, SANGRIA, Grenoble, France.
Nicolas VuillermeUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG, SANGRIA, Grenoble, France.
Muhammad AsaduzzamanDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Planetary health is an emerging field of growing global importance. Environmental changes increasingly threaten maternal and child health, while nurses and midwives play central roles across care processes. Despite these opportunities, planetary health education and training in nursing and midwifery are underdeveloped and a mapping of current approaches is critically needed. Objective: To map existing planetary health education and training initiatives for nurses and midwives and examine their reported educational and practice outcomes related to maternal and child health. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework Searches were conducted in Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE for English-language studies published from 1 January 2015 to 31 January 2026. Eligible studies addressed planetary health education and/or training for nurses or midwives. We used a standardized form to extract data, and narrative synthesis was applied given the diversity of interventions and outcomes. Results: Out of 258 records identified, seven studies published from 2019 to 2026 met the inclusion criteria. These were conducted in Australia(n = 1), Australia and New Zealand (n = 1), Spain (n = 1), Turkey (n = 2), and Uganda (n = 2). The evidence showed marked heterogeneity in study design, settings, and educational approaches. Study designs included two randomized controlled trials, one quasi-experimental study, one cross-sectional survey, two qualitative studies, and one implementation study. Educational approaches varied widely, from online courses and curriculum validation to community-based biomass smoke education and simulation-based training. Reported outcomes were grouped into five categories: knowledge, attitudes, confidence and self-efficacy, behavioral practice change, and clinical or system-level outcomes. Five studies reported improvements in attitude and satisfaction. Confidence and self-efficacy outcomes were infrequently reported. Behavioral or practice change was noted in three studies. Two studies reported direct maternal and child health benefits through reduced household air pollution exposure, but no study reported direct maternal or neonatal clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Evidence on planetary health education for nurses and midwives is emerging but remains limited. Current studies focus mainly on immediate educational outcomes rather than sustained practice change or patient-level impact. Future research should evaluate long-term competency development, clinical practice change, and measurable maternal, neonatal, and child health outcomes. Registration: OSF | Planetary Health Education and Training for Midwives and Nurses: A Scoping Review of Reported Educational and Practice Outcomes Related to Maternal and Child Health, registered 5/2/2026, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JU3GY. Social media abstract: Current planetary health education and interventions for nurses and midwives have improved knowledge, attitudes, and some practice-related behaviors but lack direct patient-level outcomes. @zamansohag08.

Indexed as

Clinical competenceMaternal-child health servicesMidwiferyNursePlanetary health educationScoping reviewStaff development

Identifiers

PMID42780475
PMCPMC13598162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.