ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2026
Perspectives of patients and families impacted by developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Knowledge translation (KT) ensures that the appropriate stakeholders, including patients and care providers are aware of and utilize research evidence to inform health decision-making. This is significant for those affected by developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), as patient experiences vary depending on the severity of their condition. To effectively improve health outcomes and quality of life for families impacted, we must first be aware of their lived experiences; therefore, we conducted focus groups with patients and caregivers of patients impacted by DDH. Methods: Patients with DDH and their caregivers were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews to learn about their diverse lived experiences. Thematic content analysis was performed on deidentified transcripts of the focus groups using NVIVO software. Results: Key patient themes included anxiety and negative emotions associated with hospital/doctor visits, self-limiting activities, long-term effects of DDH, lack of agency in decision-making, and access to support services. Caregiver discussions underscored common themes including awareness level of DDH, road to diagnosis, treatment options, sufficiency of information presented, sources of support, need for more resources, and burden. Conclusion: Focus groups provided a more comprehensive understanding of patient and caregiver experiences across the care trajectory and identified priorities for future investigation. With the knowledge gathered, we have formed a patient and family advisory group to co-develop research priorities in DDH that are relevant to patients and families. Significance of Study: This study offers deeper insight into patient and caregiver experiences, informing more responsive and patient-centered approach to DDH research and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.