SynthesisFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2026
Jointly held care documents in child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Young people accessing Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in the UK represent a digital native generation, but practices around digital care documents lag behind. Jointly held care documents could be a way of improving accessibility and inclusion of young people and parents/carers in care planning. Methods: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, King's Fund, Google Scholar, The Health Foundation, Social Care Online, Cochrane Library, Royal College of Psychiatrists, Web of Science and EconLit databases were conducted alongside grey literature searches. All eligible studies investigating the use of jointly held care documents in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services were included. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Hawker critical appraisal tool. Results: Seven studies, from research groups in the Netherlands, the USA and Norway were included. Existing studies have looked at perceptions of quality and engagement, facilitators and barriers, clinical effectiveness and adolescent and professional acceptability. Studies have used a range of methodologies and were generally of high quality, finding that jointly held care documents were mainly positively thought of by young people and parents/carers, but there was ambivalence from healthcare professionals around information sharing and the practicalities of co-creation. Conclusion: The current literature shows good acceptability of jointly held and co-created care documents amongst young people and parents. Barriers to implementation mainly exist amongst professionals. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420250652309.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.