ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
LLM-powered socially assistive robot-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy exercises: an exploratory study with university students.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental health is a significant healthcare challenge, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a widely used therapeutic method for treating anxiety and depression. However, traditional CBT often requires access to trained clinicians and can be cost-prohibitive or logistically difficult for many individuals. To address these barriers, we developed a low-cost socially assistive robot (SAR) that uses a large language model (LLM) to guide the user through interactive at-home CBT exercises. In this exploratory study, 38 university students completed CBT exercises across a 15-day period using one of three modalities: with a robot (using an LLM for dialogue), a chatbot (using the same LLM for dialogue), or traditional CBT worksheets. We measured weekly therapeutic outcomes, changes in pre-/post-session anxiety measures, and adherence to completing CBT exercises. Our findings indicate that self-reported general psychological distress significantly decreased over the study period in the robot and worksheet conditions but not in the chatbot condition. Additionally, the SAR enabled significant single-session improvements on more days than the other two conditions combined. Mixed-effects modeling further An analysis with a mixed-effects model also suggested that the robot and chatbot conditions better reduced post-session anxiety for those with elevated levels of anxiety. Our findings suggest that SAR-guided, LLM-powered CBT may be an effective method for supporting therapeutic progress and decreasing user anxiety immediately after completing the CBT exercise. The findings underscore the potential for combining AI-driven personalization with socially assistive robotics to create accessible, scalable, and engaging mental health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.