Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Construction and clinical validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for poor wound healing after anorectal surgery.

Liao Pan, Lizhi He, Jianzhen Zhao, Keya Li, Juan Gao, Zhenquan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liao PanProctology Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Lizhi HeProctology Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jianzhen ZhaoProctology Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Keya LiProctology Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Juan GaoProctology Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zhenquan WangProctology Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To construct and validate a machine learning-based risk prediction model for poor wound healing after anorectal surgery, enabling early identification and individualized intervention. Methods: Clinical data from 246 patients (Jan 2022-Dec 2024) were retrospectively collected. Wound healing status at 4 weeks post-surgery defined outcome (good: Results: BMI, diabetes, stool consistency, and preoperative perianal infection were common core predictors. In internal validation, AUCs were 0.893 (Logistic), 0.897 (RF), and 0.877 (GBM). In temporal validation, AUCs were 0.874 (Logistic), 0.865 (GBM), and 0.853 (RF). Logistic regression showed the smallest AUC fluctuation across training, internal, and temporal sets (0.864→0.893→0.874) and lowest Brier scores (0.092-0.123), indicating best calibration and generalizability. GBM achieved the highest training AUC (0.925) but significant performance decay in validation ( Conclusion: Logistic regression demonstrated the best overall discriminative ability, calibration, clinical net benefit, and cross-cohort generalizability, and is recommended as the preferred tool for individualized risk assessment. RF, after thorough optimization, shows promise as an alternative. GBM was limited by sample size and exhibited overfitting, warranting further validation in larger studies. This study provides a quantitative framework for early risk stratification in anorectal surgery patients.

Indexed as

anorectal surgeryclinical validationmachine learningrandom forestrisk predictionwound healing

Identifiers

PMID42780400
PMCPMC13597906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.