ReviewAtherosclerosis plus2026
Associations between carotid macrovascular and retinal microvascular alterations in diabetes: Evidence synthesis and implications for risk assessment.
Review in Atherosclerosis plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is characterized by progressive vascular injury affecting both the microcirculation and large arteries. Diabetic retinopathy is a major microvascular complication and has been associated in observational studies with several carotid vascular phenotypes, including increased carotid intima-media thickness, focal plaque burden, arterial stiffness, plaque vulnerability markers, and, in selected cohorts, carotid stenosis. However, these carotid endpoints differ in measurement protocol, biological meaning, and prognostic implications, and most available evidence is cross-sectional. Retinal imaging modalities, including optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography, provide quantitative measures such as vessel density, foveal avascular-zone size, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and choroidal thickness that may parallel systemic vascular injury, but validated thresholds for carotid disease detection have not been established. Shared mechanisms, including chronic hyperglycemia, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, dyslipidemia, and hypoxia-driven angiogenic signaling, may contribute to both retinal and carotid abnormalities; insulin resistance is particularly relevant to type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome, whereas diabetes duration and glycemic exposure are central across diabetes types. This narrative review therefore summarizes the associations between retinal microvascular changes and specific carotid vascular changes, while emphasizing that many findings may be influenced by shared risk factors and that most studies show association rather than causation or proven clinical utility. Current evidence supports multidisciplinary awareness and comprehensive cardiovascular risk-factor management in people with diabetes, but it does not yet justify retinal findings or OCTA metrics as validated triggers for screening asymptomatic patients with carotid ultrasonography. Prospective studies are needed to show whether combined retinal and carotid assessment improves diagnosis, risk prediction, cost-effectiveness, and patient outcomes before it can be recommended as a routine screening strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.