ArticleJSES international2026
The natural history of traumatic posterior glenohumeral dislocations in a high-risk population.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to define the clinical trajectory and treatment outcomes after traumatic posterior shoulder dislocation in patients treated both operatively and non-operatively. Methods: We queried for all patients ≤50 years old who had a posterior shoulder dislocation or subluxation event, confirmed on imaging between January 2017 and December 2024. Patients were excluded for <6 months of follow-up from the date of the dislocation or subluxation event. Functional failure was defined as persistent subjective instability/pain with a positive Kim/Jerk exam, permanent activity restrictions, or failure to return to work. Additionally, recurrent dislocation, revision surgery, or transition from therapy to surgery was considered structural failure at any time point. Results: Thirty-three shoulders met inclusion criteria. Mechanisms of injury included falls (n = 15, 45%), seizures (n = 7, 21%), combat/military training (n = 7, 21%), sports (n = 2, 6%), and motorcycle accident (n = 2, 6%). The average age at the time of injury was 28.5 years. There were 31/33 (94%) active duty service members and 2/33 (6%) immediate family of service members. Non-operative treatment was undergone in 18/33 patients (55%), and 11/18 patients (61%) failed treatment most commonly due to recurrent dislocations (n = 8, 73%). Operative treatment was undergone in 15/33 patients (45%), and the most common procedure was an arthroscopic posterior labral repair (n = 11, 73%). The average posterior glenoid bone loss in the non-operative group was 11.9% and 12.2% in the operative group. The average gamma angle for the reverse Hill-Sachs lesions in the non-operative group was 97.5° and 83.13° in the operative group. The overall failure rate of operatively managed shoulders was 8/15 shoulders (53%), due to revision surgery in 4/8 patients (50%), redislocation events in 2/8 patients (25%), and subjective instability in 2/8 patients (25%). Seven of 15 (47%) of the operative cohort were placed on permanent profile restrictions or failed to return to duty due to the injured shoulder. Conclusion: Traumatic posterior dislocations in young, active individuals demonstrated high failure rates with both operative (53%) and non-operative (61%) management, though direct comparison between treatment groups is limited by treatment selection bias. Nearly all patients with failure after operative intervention failed to return fully to their occupation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.